Skip to content
All cases

Reference designDemand Forecasting + Inventory Optimization· 4 months

Planning ran on a spreadsheet and one growth rate. Stock now follows actual demand.

Weighted MAPE · before

12.1%

Spreadsheet with blended growth rate

Weighted MAPE · after

2.7%

Reconciled hierarchical forecast

The problem

Planning used spreadsheets and a single growth assumption applied to everything. Popular lines ran out while slow ones sat in the warehouse tying up cash, and nobody could put a number on the trade-off between the two.

What was built

We built forecasting that works product by product and adds up consistently to category and company totals, plugged into the planning process people already used, and able to answer what-if questions.

What changed

Forecast error fell from 12.1% to 2.7%. Cash previously tied up in the wrong stock was released without more items running out, and planners now review the exceptions instead of rebuilding spreadsheets.

Tell us about the task.

The first call is free. If this system is not the right answer for your numbers, we say so.

All solutions